Click Here to download a PDF of the draft program.
Global Conference on the Prevention of Genocide
Draft Program
Thursday 11th October |
|||
1. Special Opening Night Plenary: Speaking the Unspeakable: Listening to the Voices of Survivors |
|||
Friday 12th October |
Saturday 13th October |
||
9.00-11.00am |
9.00-10.30 |
9. Facing History and Ourselves: Imagining a World Without Genocide |
|
COFFEE BREAK |
|||
11.30-1pm |
4. Is Genocide Preventable? The Foreseeability of Mass Violence |
11.00-1.00pm |
11. Can the ICC help stop the atrocities in Darfur? |
LUNCH |
|||
2.00-3.30pm |
2.00-3.30 |
13. Shaping Public Opinion: The Role of the Media |
|
COFFEE BREAK |
|||
4.00-5.30pm |
7. Economics and Genocide: Reconciling Profit and Prevention |
4.00-6.00pm Closing
Session |
|
Thursday, October 11, 5pm 1. Special Opening Night Plenary: Speaking the Unspeakable: Listening to the Voices of Survivors The Global Conference begins by listening to the stories of four survivors, who will speak of their experiences in the Jewish and Roma Holocausts, and Cambodian and Rwandan genocides. These stories are the essential starting point for our exploration of why good people allow evil to happen, and how it is possible to awaken the sense of moral urgency that will make prevention of genocide a reality. Chair: Professor Payam Akhavan, Faculty of Law, McGill University Introductory remarks:
Panelists:
Respondents:
Musical Performances by: |
Friday,
October 12, 9 – 11am Is genocide an expression of residual barbarity or a reflection
of the unprecedented violence of modernity? Is there
a common element characterizing different genocides or is each
unique? How do historical conceptions of genocide shape
our contemporary understanding of whether it is possible to effectively
confront this scourge? This panel explores four notorious
genocides, the Armenians in 1915-17, the Holocaust, Cambodia
1975-79, and Rwanda 1994, and relates the historical lessons
learned to our current reality and future challenges.
|
Friday,
October 12, 11:30 – 1pm Sixty years after the Nuremburg Tribunal, the international community has established an International Criminal Court and other tribunals with a view to punishing and deterring genocide. How is it possible to effectively prosecute culpable leaders if there is no willingness to intervene with force? Is justice a contribution to or impediment to a peace process where power realities require negotiations with leaders implicated in genocide? Do perpetrators of genocide engage in a cost-benefit calculus such that punishment can deter those contemplating crimes in the future? Or is it a futile attempt to make overwhelming evil more manageable to create the illusion of progress? This panel will consider these questions through the prism of practitioners and academics, and the perspectives of both law and politics. Chair: Professor
William Schabas - Director of Irish Centre for Human Rights,
National University of Ireland
|
Friday,
October 12, 11:30 – 1pm In order to prevent genocide, it must be predicted. What are the ingredients of genocide? Is it possible to predict with any degree of precision whether tensions will escalate into genocidal violence? When is the appropriate time for intervention? What are the modalities of intervention? This panel will speak about situations such as Rwanda and Burundi to consider where and how early intervention was possible and whether it is capable of successfully preventing genocide. Chair: The
Rt. Hon. Joe Clark - former Prime Minister of Canada; Professor,
McGill Centre for Developing-Area Studies
|
Friday,
October 12, 2 – 3:30 pm How is it possible to expeditiously trigger the UN into action
considering both the bureaucratic inertia and political reticence
that characterizes the decision-making process? Are behind
the scenes initiatives preferable to public advocacy? Which
are the most significant points on contact within the UN Secretariat
in terms of information flow and policy prescriptions? How
can the Secretary-General influence the Security Council and
other UN bodies? What is the role and record thus far of
the UN Special-Advisor on Prevention of Genocide? How
is the Responsibility to Protect perceived within policy-making
circles within the UN system? This panel of eminent diplomats
and experts will consider these questions in light of their experience
within the UN system over the past few years.
|
Friday,
October 12, 4 – 5:30 pm Civil society has become an increasingly important stakeholder in the prevention of genocide, not least where governments are unwilling to take action. How has the role of non-governmental organizations evolved and what does the future hold? Are effective partnerships with governments and business desirable or is there a danger that mainstreaming of human rights will dilute the independence and effectiveness of civil society? What strategies have worked in the past in order to mobilize public opinion? How much can civil society achieve absent action by governments? This panel will reflect on both the practice and theory of such social movements and their potential and limitations in making the prevention of genocide a reality. Chair: Dr. Razmik Panossian - Director
of Policy and Programmes, Rights and Democracy, Montréal
|
Friday,
October 12, 4 – 5:30 pm Genocidal regimes are often sustained by economic relations including foreign trade and investment. What is the role of governments and corporations in ensuring that they are not complicit in genocide? What should be the criteria for determining whether economic sanctions or divestment are necessary and desirable? What are the institutions that can facilitate such policies? This panel brings together perspectives from government, business, and academia, focusing in particular on the situation in Darfur. Chair: Tony Comper – Immediate Past President and CEO of BMO Financial Group Panelists:
|
Saturday,
October 13, 9 – 10:30am Governments are often reluctant to intervene against genocide because there is no viable “exit strategy”. How can such fears be adequately addressed? Beyond activism aimed at getting governments to act, what are strategies and policies that are likely to mitigate the political burden of intervention? This panel will consider how decision-makers assess such situations and the factors that shape policy with a view to devising strategies that will facilitate prevention. Chair: Professor Stephen Toope - President of the University of British Columbia Panelists:
|
Saturday,
October 13, 9-10.30am In the aftermath of genocide, survivors, perpetrators and outsiders are left at an historic crossroad. Can they imagine a new world rebuilt from the rubble of mass violence? This panel includes an interactive session with a videolink to the Kigali Memorial Centre in Kigali, Rwanda. Survivors of the Rwandan genocide and General Roméo Dallaire, a witness, discuss the event and its continued impact on them and their ability and desire to participate in a nation rebuilding itself ten years on. Chair: Professor
René Provost - Director of the McGill Centre for Human
Rights and Legal Pluralism
|
Saturday,
October 13, 11am – 1pm How is it possible for ordinary people to rationalize mass-murder of other human beings? What is the process of dehumanization that justifies, indeed compels such violence? What has been the historical role of the media in banalizing evil to the point where savagery is glorified as an expression of heroism? What lessons can we learn from the past about the use of hate propaganda and the prevention of genocide? Should hate speech be banned or confronted with competing messages from other actors in society? This panel will consider these questions based on political and academic perspectives, and through multi-media illustrations of hate propaganda in past genocides. Chair: Professor
David Scheffer - Northwestern University School of Law; former
U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues
|
Saturday,
October 13, 11am – 1pm Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, will discuss the ICC’s role in stopping atrocities in Darfur. The ICC arrest warrants against Sudanese leaders have been issued during an on-going conflict. How has this influenced the actions of the Sudanese government, the UN or other international actors? The Prosecutor will reflect on the ICC’s experience thus far and consider the future of international criminal justice in terms of prevention of atrocities. Moderated by Professor Payam Akhavan. |
Saturday,
October 13, 2 – 3:30pm The doctrine of a ‘right to intervene’ has evolved into a ‘responsibility to protect’. But there is a considerable gap between the lofty aspirations and the narrow political interest that often shape the decision-making process. How can self-interested governments and other actors be persuaded to take costly political action to intervene against genocide? Had the emergence of the Responsibility to Protect made an appreciable difference in how action against genocide is considered? This panel includes leaders that have been intimately engaged in promoting this concept and will consider these questions through the prism of both practice and theory. Chair: The Hon. Gareth Evans - Director of the International Crisis Group Panelists:
|
Saturday,
October 13, 2 – 3:30pm The media plays a central role in ensuring that the wider public is aware of on-going atrocities. But genocide in distant lands has to compete with other often trivial interests that the public is interested in. And the horrors of genocide are so overwhelming that the public feels powerless to do anything. What is the role of the media in prioritizing and conveying such realities to the public? How is the line between objective reporting and mobilizing public opinion reconciled? This panel of eminent journalists will discuss the challenges confronted in dealing these dilemmas. Chair: Professor Allan Thompson - Carleton School of Journalism and Communication Panelists:
|
Saturday,
October 13, 4 – 6pm What does leadership mean in the context of confronting genocide? How can moral vision and power realities be reconciled? What lessons can future leaders learn from the recent past in order to transform the political culture that has so often failed the victims of genocide? This discussion with eminent leaders will include a dialogue with the Young Leaders Forum and a reflection of how the experiences of the past should shape our strategies and vision for the future. Chair: Professor Payam Akhavan - Faculty of Law, McGill University Panelists:
In conversation with the Young Leaders 2007 |


